Carnige essays

Carnige essays Wealth can be measured in many instances; material values or moral and character ethics for example. In society today, the amounts of money, the quantity of property or the worth of possessions dictate the level of status or way of life. These resources acquired through personal success are controlled by the successor. In Carnegies time of 1889 wealth was measured to the equivalent of today but on a more superior scale. He argues that the unequal distribution of wealth needs to be resolved. The idea of distributing wealth evenly amongst the rich and the poor is inequitable to the wealthy. Tearing and destroying a prosperous persons wealth to justify the poor mans failure to succeed disproves the American dream of opportunity. Along with that disproportionate proposal rises a problem with the ethical standing of individualism, distinctiveness and uniqueness. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness has been an American phrase since the birth of the United States. The idea of dissembling the wealth acquired by the rich and distributing it to the less fortunate contradicts this phrase. The three natural rights are guaranteed to all citizens, rich or poor. Both classes were given the ability to succeed in the areas of wealth, and to strip the accomplished of their wealth only to distribute it to others is a lengthened process called robbery. Combining class structure through equal wealth distribution is a disaster for individualism. Turning back ones ability to distinguish him compared to his challenger or neighbor allows conformity to ascend. This is another ethical contradiction of the American way where individuality is a lead trait. If the wealth structure were evened out, both classes would be tossed into a melting pot where working laboring people would be pitted against the average loaf or lethargic man. All motivation to rise above the competitor would be destroyed through distribution. ...